E-mail snooping rider on child porn bill. This week I was phone solicited by the Concerned Women for America to support HR 4623, which is supposed to be a more legally tight version of the 1996 virtual child pornography law that was struck down last month by the U.S. Supreme court for being too vague. I agreed to a $10 pledge, but after researching the issue I retracted. I discovered the provision 8(a)(2) that would allow the federal government to request copies of e-mail for any reason without a court order. [kuro5hin.org]